Ripple CLO Clarifies the Misconception Around Bitcoin Decentralization 

Share This Post

U.S. Tariffs Could Be Used to Buy Bitcoin, Predicts Fred Krueger

The post Ripple CLO Clarifies the Misconception Around Bitcoin Decentralization  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, Stuart Alderoty, explained the misconception of decentralization in crypto. In his latest X post, Alderoty said the idea of decentralization is not unique to Bitcoin, just because it doesn’t have a CEO.

Decentralization is not Unique to Bitcoin

According to Alderoty, the idea of decentralization is based on permissionless systems, participation, and validation that is not under the control of a central authority. This means that the structure of decentralization is not exclusive to Bitcoin just because it doesn’t have a CEO.

He said, “Bitcoin doesn’t have a CEO, but that’s not ideology. It’s the fundamental design of all open, permissionless tokens.” 

He warned the policymakers and regulators that treating Bitcoin as the only truly decentralized system could lead to misguided regulations and poor policy decisions. The National Cryptocurrency Association (NCA) emphasized this and said that there are other decentralized tokens like Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and Cardano, which are not controlled by a single person, company, or CEO. 

XRP is Decentralized, Says Ripple CEO 

Besides Alderoty, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse also clarified that XRP is decentralized as it is an open-source technology that exists independently of Ripple. XRP Ledger, the public blockchain, stated in a blog post that Ripple is a technology company and XRP is a digital asset independent of this. 

“XRP is a digital asset that’s native to the XRP Ledger—an open-source, permissionless and decentralized blockchain technology,” it said.

Problems Follow Misconception 

The misconception of Bitcoin is the only decentralized crypto can lead to regulatory blind spots, meaning regulators might craft rules specifically targeting Bitcoin’s structure. This failure to accommodate other decentralized tokens would stifle innovation and result in flawed frameworks. 

Other than this, networks that prioritize faster transactions like XRP will be hindered if the policies prioritize BTC’s structure, which comes with a slower transaction speed. The ill-fitting rules will also impact the cross-border payments and censorship resistance in decentralized finance (DeFi). 

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Crypto officially becomes a “third category” of property, fixing the fatal flaw in digital asset ownership.

The UK doesn’t pass many one-clause statutes that redraw the map of personal property, but that’s exactly what arrived with Royal Assent on Dec2 After years of academic papers, Law Commission

Real-World Asset Market Cools off With a 1.09% Pullback This Month

Tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) slipped slightly this month, with total distributed value falling 109% as $268 million quietly exited the sector since the first of November Worldwide RWA Value

What Caused Bitcoin Price To Crash Below $90K Today?

The post What Caused Bitcoin Price To Crash Below $90K Today appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Bitcoin fell sharply on Friday, slipping below $90,000 after a wave of leveraged liquidations hit

Obscura Hardfork: Privacy, Scalability, and Network Resilience

This content is provided by a sponsor The Beldex blockchain upgraded to Obscura at block height 4939540, on December 7, 2025 Obscura strengthens a core pillar of privacy-preserving blockchains:

Ripple News: XRP Officially Listed on Regulated Exchange OSL Hong Kong

The post Ripple News: XRP Officially Listed on Regulated Exchange OSL Hong Kong appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News OSL Hong Kong, a regulated digital asset exchange, has listed XRP on its

Is Crypto a Security? Part II: Utility Tokens

Law and Ledger is a news segment focusing on crypto legal news, brought to you by Kelman Law – A law firm focused on digital asset commerce Is Crypto a Security Part II: Utility Tokens The opinion