Crypto.com says operating in-house trading team, market maker not ‘controversial’

Share This Post

Crypto.com has an internal trading team and operates as a market maker on its platform, highlighting a potential conflict of interest, reported the Financial Times.

Market makers provide liquidity, ensuring users can buy and sell quickly at prevailing market prices. The function reduces the risk of price fluctuation and enables efficient trading.

Earlier this month, Securities and Exchange Commission chair Gary Gensler criticized crypto exchanges for often commingling functions. He said, “In traditional finance, we don’t see the New York Stock Exchange also operating a hedge fund, making markets.”

Crypto.com defended its position by saying in-house market making is “not a controversial practice.”

Conflict of interest

Exchanges protect their customers’ interests, while trading teams aim to earn profit. If an exchange has its own market maker and traders, there is a risk that it may prioritize its interests over those of other parties.

For example, user orders could be executed at less favorable prices than the exchange’s trading desk. In addition, exchanges have access to market data, including order flow and trading volumes, which could be used to give an unfair advantage over other traders.

More importantly, with control over the trading platform and their trading desk, exchanges may be able to manipulate the market, including artificially inflating trading volumes and creating misleading market trends.

Crypto.com says there’s nothing to worry about

Crypto.com told the FT that its internal market maker is treated “exactly the same” as third-party market makers on the exchange.

Regarding its trading team, the firm said its traders hedge their positions on different platforms to ensure Crypto.com remains “risk neutral” – adding that it does not rely on its trading desk as a significant source of revenue, which mostly comes from its retail trading app.

Unnamed sources cited by the FT alleged that Crypto.com’s trading desk primarily aims to generate money, not to facilitate an exchange, and that it had asked employees to deny the existence of an internal trading team and in-house market maker operations.

Crypto.com said it had not requested staff to lie to other market participants.

Due to the hostile U.S. regulatory landscape, the firm is set to close its institutional exchange in the country this week.

The post Crypto.com says operating in-house trading team, market maker not ‘controversial’ appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Read Entire Article
spot_img

Related Posts

Crypto Expert Willy Woo Predicts Bitcoin Has Room To Run – Here Are The Drivers

Crypto expert Willy Woo has predicted that Bitcoin will still make significant moves to the upside He made this claim based on an indicator that suggests crypto investors are still willing to buy the

Phony Philanthropy? Notcoin’s $6.8 Million Gift To Telegram Founder Rings Alarm Bells

The burgeoning world of cryptocurrency continues to grapple with issues of transparency, with a recent donation raising eyebrows across the digital currency landscape Notcoin, a brand new

Nigerian Court Rules Tigran Gambaryan Can Face Tax Evasion Charges on Behalf of Binance

The Binance executive, Tigran Gambaryan, who is currently in jail, has been deemed eligible by a Nigerian court to represent the cryptocurrency exchange in its ongoing tax evasion trial A

Mastercard Welcomes 5 Startups to Blockchain and Digital Asset Program

Mastercard’s Start Path Blockchain and Digital Asset program has expanded to include five new startups, aiming to explore innovative uses of blockchain technology “Digital assets are

Mastercard Welcomes 5 Startups to Blockchain and Digital Asset Program

Mastercard’s Start Path Blockchain and Digital Asset program has expanded to include five new startups, aiming to explore innovative uses of blockchain technology “Digital assets are

Financial Nonprofit Better Markets: Approving a Spot Ether ETF Would Threaten ‘the Broader Financial System’

Better Markets, a financial nonprofit organization, has lashed out against approving a spot ether ETF product, stating that it would endanger the broader financial system In a supplemental comment
- Advertisement -spot_img