Bitcoin Coalition Pushes Back Against MSCI Proposal Targeting Bitcoin-Heavy Companies

Share This Post

Bitcoin Magazine

Bitcoin Coalition Pushes Back Against MSCI Proposal Targeting Bitcoin-Heavy Companies

Bitcoin For Corporations (BFC), in coordination with its member companies, formally challenged MSCI’s proposed rule to exclude companies from the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes if digital assets represent 50% or more of total assets. 

The rule would apply to companies whose primary business is classified as digital-asset treasury activity.

BFC argues the proposal misclassifies operating companies by prioritizing balance-sheet holdings over actual business operations.

“MSCI has long defined companies by what they do, not by what they hold. This proposal abandons that principle for a single asset class,” said George Mekhail, managing director of BFC. “A shareholder-approved treasury decision shouldn’t override that reality.”

The coalition identified three structural issues with the proposal. First, it redefines primary business based on asset composition rather than revenue-generating operations. Second, it singles out digital assets while other asset classes face no similar treatment. 

Third, it ties index inclusion to volatile market prices, creating unpredictable membership changes.

BFC warned that the proposal could lead to passive fund outflows, higher capital costs, and increased volatility for companies, all unrelated to operational performance. 

The group urged MSCI to withdraw the threshold, maintain an operations-based classification, ensure asset-class neutrality, and engage with market participants on a business-aligned framework.

Strive echoes the sentiment 

Strive Asset Management, co-founded by Vivek Ramaswamy, also formally urged MSCI last week to reconsider its proposal to exclude companies with bitcoin holdings exceeding 50% of total assets from major equity benchmarks. 

In a letter to MSCI CEO Henry Fernandez, Strive warned that the rule could produce inconsistent results due to differing accounting standards under U.S. GAAP and IFRS.

Strive, the 14th-largest corporate bitcoin holder with over 7,500 BTC, argued that the 50% threshold is “unjustified, overbroad, and unworkable.” Its executives highlighted that many bitcoin treasury companies operate real businesses in sectors such as AI data centers, structured finance, and cloud infrastructure. 

They compared the proposed treatment of bitcoin to other assets, noting that energy companies with large oil reserves or gold miners are not excluded from indexes.

The firm also cited market volatility, derivatives exposure, and accounting differences as factors that could make index inclusion unpredictable. 

Strive warned that strict rules could drive innovation abroad, giving international firms a competitive advantage.

MSCI plans to announce its decision on January 15, 2026. Strive’s intervention reinforces the broader industry call for operations-based classification, asset-class neutrality, and fair treatment of companies holding significant bitcoin as part of their treasury strategy.

MSCI could exclude Strategy

Perhaps the company most affected by this would be Strategy, the tech- and Bitcoin-focused software company famous for its bold Bitcoin reserve strategy. Strategy and Chairman Michael Saylor recently pushed back against concerns that MSCI could exclude the company from major equity indices, which analysts warn might trigger billions in passive outflows. 

Saylor emphasized that Strategy is not a fund or holding company but an operating business with a $500 million software division and a $7.7 billion Bitcoin-backed credit program. 

He highlighted products like Stretch ($STRC), a Bitcoin-backed credit instrument, and stressed that Strategy actively creates, structures, and operates financial products rather than passively holding assets. 

Disclaimer: Bitcoin For Corporations And Bitcoin Magazine both operate under the parent company of BTC Inc.

This post Bitcoin Coalition Pushes Back Against MSCI Proposal Targeting Bitcoin-Heavy Companies first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Read Entire Article
spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Related Posts

Analysts Split on XRP Future Outlook as Centralization Debate Intensifies

The outlook for XRP is becoming increasingly polarized as traders, analysts, and industry critics weigh in on its price trajectory, governance model, and growing institutional interest Related

Paradigm Leads $13.5M Round Backing Crown’s Real-Pegged BRLV Stablecoin

Crown has raised $135 million in a Series A round led by Paradigm as the São Paulo fintech expands its institutional stablecoin infrastructure and the circulation of its Brazilian real–pegged

CRO Demand Surges as 21Shares Commits to Accelerating Its Mainstream Adoption 

The post CRO Demand Surges as 21Shares Commits to Accelerating Its Mainstream Adoption  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Cronos (CRO) has received a major boost from 21Shares On Monday,

Robinhood Enters Indonesia’s Booming Crypto Market With Twin Fintech Deal

Robinhood Markets moved into Indonesia this week by signing deals to buy two local firms, a step that gives it instant access to a big pool of investors Related Reading: Bitcoin Boost: Fidelity CEO

Report: Ripple Funding Round Offered Investors Protection Against XRP Volatility

Ripple’s successful $500 million strategic funding round that valued the company at $40 billion reportedly included rare and stringent protections for investors Guaranteed Returns and Put Options

Bitcoin is tracking a hidden $400 billion Fed liquidity signal that matters more than rate cuts

Bitcoin’s price action continues to drift into the Federal Reserve’s final policy decision of the year with little outward volatility, yet the underlying market structure reflects a very